Mobile app · in build · classified-ish
We can't kill the interview yet. So we're arming the candidates.
An unfair advantage for an unfair process. UNFAIR. is an AI in your corner for every round that still exists — built by the people who run the index, trained on 1,284 ways it goes wrong.
One round. Instant acceptance. Waitlisters get the beta first and the newsletter meanwhile — that's the deal.
Briefings, powered by the index.
Know their process before they do. Rounds, take-home hours, ghost rate, the questions they repeat, where candidates before you got cut — pulled from real reports on the exact company you're walking into. They've read your CV. Now you've read their file.
Mock rounds with the Host.
Practice against an interviewer with no patience for waffle and no ghosting policy. System design, behavioural, the take-home defence — brutal feedback, unlimited retries, and a debrief after every round telling you exactly what would have sunk you for real.
Live mode.
Our solicitor describes this feature as absolutely not, delete this section. It activates when the interviewer shares their screen and works best if redacted redacted redacted. You'll know it when you need it.
CLASSIFIEDWhy "unfair"?
Because the process was unfair first.
The interview asks you to do unpaid work and calls it a take-home. It asks you to memorise puzzles you will never use and calls it a bar. It asks nine strangers to perform confidence at each other for eleven weeks, and when it's done wasting everyone's time, it doesn't even say no. It says nothing.
Companies prep for you. They share notes, run debriefs, keep scorecards, and backchannel your references. You get a Glassdoor page and a prayer. That asymmetry has a name, and it isn't "meritocracy."
UNFAIR. doesn't cheat the process. It evens it. Every briefing comes from candidates who walked in before you. Every mock round makes you genuinely better. And if the existence of a prepared candidate feels like an unfair advantage — that tells you everything about the process.
An unfair advantage for an unfair process.
The roadmap, honestly
No fake "coming this quarter."Questions you're already typing
Is this cheating?+
The process asks for unpaid labour, memorised puzzles, and eleven weeks of your life, then ghosts you. We think “fair” left the building some time ago. UNFAIR. briefs you, trains you, and coaches you — preparation has never been cheating. As for live mode: that's between you, your conscience, and our solicitor, who has stopped replying.
When does it ship?+
When it's good. The roadmap above is the honest one: we're in build. Waitlisters get the private beta first and the newsletter while they wait — which, judging by our inbox, is the only waitlist in tech that tells you anything at all.
iOS or Android?+
Yes. iOS first, if we're honest, because that's where the beta tooling is less painful. Android close behind.
Will it do the Leetcode for me?+
It will make sure Leetcode never surprises you again — the patterns, the follow-ups, the exact variants the index says this company recycles. Read into that whatever you like.
Where does the briefing data come from?+
How much will it cost?+
Free for waitlist beta users. After that: meaningfully less than the value of the weeks it saves you. Pricing announced when shipping is, and not a moment of false certainty sooner.
Who's building this?+
The people who run goodbye, interview. We've read 1,284 ghosting reports, 9,431 hours of unpaid take-homes, and one story about a reference check for a job that didn't exist. We are extremely motivated.
The waitlist · one round · instant acceptance
Their next interview won't know what hit it.
Join the waitlist and you're first into the beta. Until then, the newsletter keeps score — stories, satire, and the index, weekly.